Stair Climbing and Heart Health: What the New Evidence Actually Says

Last updated: 23/08/2026

Regular stair climbing is associated with a 39% lower risk of dying from cardiovascular disease and a 24% lower risk of dying from any cause, according to a systematic review of nine studies and 480,479 people published in the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs on 13/08/2026. The strongest signal in the underlying data sits at roughly six to ten flights a day, spread across normal daily life rather than done as a workout. The evidence is observational, so it shows a strong and consistent association rather than proof that stairs alone cause the benefit.

That last sentence matters, and most of the coverage of this study left it out. This guide covers what the new analysis found, where the evidence is genuinely strong, where it is weaker than the headlines suggest, what stair climbing does inside your body, how many flights are worth aiming for, and who should be careful before they start.

What the new 2026 meta-analysis actually found

Researchers at the University of East Anglia and Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital screened 1,873 studies and pooled the nine that met their quality criteria. Between them, those studies followed 480,479 people, with a median follow-up of around 14 years.

The headline results came from the five studies with mortality data, covering 455,619 people. Frequent stair climbers had a relative risk of cardiovascular death of 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.79), which is the 39% reduction reported everywhere. For death from any cause, the relative risk was 0.76 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.94), the 24% figure.

The team also reported lower rates of heart attack, stroke and heart failure among regular stair users, though they did not publish separate pooled estimates for each of those outcomes.

Dr Sophie Paddock, who led the work, made the practical point plainly: unlike a gym session, climbing stairs is something you can fit into a day you were going to have anyway. Professor Vassilios Vassiliou described it as a practical and often overlooked way to build activity into daily life.

Both of those statements are reasonable. Neither of them is the same as saying stairs will cut your risk of a cardiac death by 39%, and the researchers themselves did not claim that.

Why the evidence is weaker than the headline

There is a specific problem with observational studies of stair climbing, and it has a name: reverse causation.

People who climb stairs several times a day are, on average, people who can climb stairs several times a day. They tend to have better joints, better balance, better lungs and fewer of the quiet early-stage illnesses that make a staircase feel like a mountain. Those same qualities independently predict living longer.

A 2026 analysis in Healthcare by Di Baggio and Romano Spica set this out directly. The dose-response gradient that looks so convincing, more flights meaning lower risk, may partly reflect an unmeasured continuum of vitality and frailty rather than a genuine exposure-and-effect relationship. Most of the underlying data also relies on people remembering and self-reporting how many flights they climb, which is not a precise measurement.

The counter-evidence is worth taking seriously too. A large UK Biobank analysis of 280,423 people published in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle found that climbing more than five flights a day at home was associated with lower all-cause and cancer mortality, with the lowest risk at six to ten flights per day (hazard ratio 0.91). But for cardiovascular mortality specifically, the association disappeared entirely (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.29).

Those authors were blunt about their own findings. The size of the association was small, it appeared vulnerable to residual confounding, and it was unlikely that at-home stair climbing on its own provided enough of a stimulus to lower the risk of premature death.

So the honest summary is this. Multiple large cohorts consistently show that stair climbers do better. Whether the stairs are doing the work, or whether stair climbing is a marker for people who are already healthier and more active overall, is not settled by this kind of study and probably cannot be.

That does not make stairs useless. It means the case for stairs rests on a second, stronger body of evidence: the controlled trials.

The trial evidence: stairs really do change your fitness

Where the observational data is ambiguous, the intervention studies are much cleaner, because they randomise people and measure what actually happens.

In a study published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, sedentary young women climbed a 199-step public staircase at 90 steps a minute, building from one ascent a day in week one to five ascents a day by weeks seven and eight, five days a week. Compared with controls, they gained a 17.1% increase in maximal oxygen uptake and a 7.7% reduction in LDL cholesterol.

A later trial in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise went shorter and harder. Sedentary women trained three days a week for six weeks, with each session built around three 20-second bursts of vigorous stair climbing separated by recovery walking. Peak oxygen uptake rose by around 13%, from an all-out training commitment of roughly three minutes a week.

The most clinically interesting trial involved people who already had heart disease. In Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 18 patients with coronary artery disease, average age 61, were randomised either to traditional moderate-intensity cardiac rehabilitation of at least 30 minutes at 60% to 80% of peak heart rate, or to a stair protocol of three bouts of six flights of 12 stairs at a self-selected vigorous pace, roughly 90 seconds each, separated by 90 seconds of walking.

Over 12 weeks, both groups improved peak oxygen uptake by about 3.5 mL/kg/min, which is a clinically meaningful gain. The stair group reached it in a fraction of the time commitment, in a stairwell, without equipment.

That is the strongest argument for stairs. Not that they magically prevent cardiac death, but that they raise cardiorespiratory fitness, and cardiorespiratory fitness is one of the most reliable predictors of long-term health we have.

Older adults benefit differently. In a Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports trial, healthy seniors averaging 70 years old trained three times a week for eight weeks. Those taking two steps at a time dropped their resting heart rate by around eight beats per minute, lowered their exercise heart rate during moderate uphill walking by around 11 beats per minute, and improved dynamic balance. Better balance in an older adult is not a side benefit. It is fall prevention.

What one minute of stairs does to your blood sugar

This is the part of the stair-climbing story that gets the least attention and is arguably the most immediately useful, particularly in India.

Stair climbing recruits a large amount of leg muscle very quickly, and contracting muscle pulls glucose out of the bloodstream through a pathway that does not need insulin to do it. The effect is fast, and it is measurable after a single bout.

In a randomised controlled crossover trial published in the Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness, 31 young adults ate a 650-calorie mixed meal and then either sat still or climbed and descended stairs at a comfortable pace for one, three or ten minutes. Compared with sitting, blood glucose was lower by about 14 mg/dL after just one minute of stairs, and by about 18 mg/dL after three minutes. Insulin fell in every stair condition, and insulin sensitivity improved after three minutes.

One minute. At a comfortable pace. After lunch.

A systematic review in the Journal of Sports Sciences covering 25 studies found the same pattern with an important qualification: acute stair climbing reduced post-meal glucose in people with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes in eight of nine studies, but not reliably in people whose blood sugar control was already normal. If your glucose handling is already good, a minute of stairs will not change much. If it is not, this is where the benefit lands.

Indian researchers have tested this in exactly the context most office workers live in. A randomised crossover trial published in Scientific Reports in 2025 took 28 sedentary young adults and had them either sit continuously after lunch, or interrupt that sitting with two minutes of stair climbing (two flights) every 30 minutes at a moderate self-paced effort. Post-lunch glucose was significantly lower in both the first and second hour with the stair breaks.

If you already know your numbers are drifting, this is a cheap intervention to add on top of the usual advice, and it pairs naturally with understanding what insulin resistance actually is and how it develops before a diabetes diagnosis ever appears.

Timing matters more than most people realise. A meta-analysis in Sports Medicine pooled eight randomised crossover trials and found that exercise after a meal reduced glucose excursions significantly compared with both exercise before the meal and no exercise at all, while exercise before eating was no better than sitting still. The shorter the gap between finishing the meal and moving, the better the effect.

The practical translation: the stairs are worth more at 2 pm on the way back from the canteen than at 7 am before breakfast.

Why this matters more in India than in the UK

The study behind the headlines was run in England. The finding travels, but the context does not.

Cardiovascular disease accounts for around 45% of deaths among Indians aged 40 to 69, according to the World Health Organisation’s India office. That is the working-age band. It is not a disease of old age here in the way it is in much of Europe.

At the same time, South Asia has one of the highest rates of physical inactivity in the world. WHO data published in The Lancet Global Health in 2024 put the regional figure at 45% of adults not meeting the recommended 150 minutes of moderate activity a week, against a global average of 31%.

Those two facts sit on top of each other. A population with an unusually early cardiovascular burden is also one of the least physically active, and the trend has been moving in the wrong direction, not the right one.

Then there is the specifically Indian architecture of the problem. Urban India has spent 25 years building vertically. Millions of people now live in flats between the fourth and twentieth floor and work in offices with the same layout, which means they pass a staircase four to eight times a day and use a lift every single time.

There is no other country where the raw opportunity is this abundant and this systematically unused. A resident of a tenth-floor flat who takes the stairs down every morning and up once in the evening has done more vertical work than most gym members manage in a week, at no cost, in clothes they were already wearing.

The counter-arguments are real, though, and worth naming rather than glossing over. Many Indian apartment stairwells are poorly lit, poorly ventilated, used for storage, and treated as service space rather than circulation space. Summer heat in a closed concrete stairwell is punishing. In monsoon months, the steps get slick. None of that makes stairs a bad idea, but it does mean the honest advice is to check your particular staircase before you commit to it, not to assume it is safe because stairs in general are.

How many flights, and how hard?

The dose-response evidence is messier than any single number suggests, so here is what the different studies actually found.

The UK Biobank analysis in Atherosclerosis, following 458,860 people for a median of 12.5 years, compared people by flights climbed per day against those who climbed none. One to five flights showed no significant benefit (hazard ratio 0.97). Six to ten flights gave a hazard ratio of 0.84 for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Eleven to fifteen flights, 0.78. Sixteen to twenty, 0.77. Twenty-one or more, 0.81, so the curve flattens and then slightly reverses rather than continuing to improve.

A separate analysis of 442,027 UK Biobank participants in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine found that climbing stairs more than 15 times a day was associated with lower risk in eight of nine disease outcomes examined, ranging from 3% lower risk for cancer up to 51% lower for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Three practical conclusions come out of that spread.

One to five flights a day is probably not enough. This is the single most useful finding, and it is the one that gets lost. If you take the stairs occasionally and think of yourself as someone who takes the stairs, the data suggests you are below the threshold where anything shows up.

Six flights a day is a reasonable target. It appears repeatedly as the point where associations become meaningful, and it maps onto roughly 60 to 100 steps, which is a realistic daily total for most people in a city.

More is better up to a point, then it plateaus. There is no evidence that 30 flights a day is twice as good as 15.

On intensity, the trial evidence points somewhere useful. The research on vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity, published in Nature Medicine, followed 25,241 adults who did no formal exercise at all and tracked them with wrist-worn devices. A median of about 4.4 minutes a day of short vigorous bursts, taken as a median of three bouts a day, was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.51 for cardiovascular mortality and 0.61 for all-cause mortality compared with no such activity. The lowest dose showing benefit was 3.4 minutes a day.

Stair climbing is the textbook example of that kind of activity. It exceeds six METs, which places it firmly in the vigorous category rather than the moderate one, and unlike jogging it requires no change of clothes, no route and no decision.

A four-week plan for someone starting from zero

This is deliberately conservative. If you are already active, compress it.

Week 1: replace the lift once a day. One journey, up only, at whatever pace lets you still hold a conversation at the top. If you live or work above the sixth floor, take the lift most of the way and walk the last three floors. Take the lift down. Descent is where falls and knee complaints come from, and there is no aerobic reason to rush into it.

Week 2: twice a day, and stop counting speed. Add a second climb, ideally after lunch rather than first thing, given what the post-meal glucose data shows. The goal this week is consistency, not effort.

Week 3: add the post-meal minute. Keep both climbs, and add one minute of easy stair walking, up and down, within about 15 minutes of finishing your largest meal of the day. This is the intervention with the best short-term trial evidence behind it and the lowest effort cost.

Week 4: introduce one hard bout. Once or twice this week, on one of your existing climbs, go up two or three flights fast enough that talking becomes difficult, then walk normally for a couple of minutes to recover. This is the ‘exercise snack’ pattern from the trials. In a randomised pilot in the Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, inactive young adults doing three roughly 30-second all-out stair bouts a day, spaced at least an hour apart, three days a week, stuck with the programme at a 97% compliance rate and reported an 8% improvement in quality of life and a 7% reduction in perceived stress over six weeks.

From there, six flights a day is the target to hold. Not as a workout. As a default setting.

A note on how you climb: taking two steps at a time recruits more muscle and produces the larger cardiovascular adaptations in the older-adult trial. It also demands more balance and more knee flexion, so it is not the place to start if you are unsteady or your knees complain. Earn it.

If none of this feels achievable yet, the sequencing problem is the real one, and our guide on how to start working out as a beginner covers building the base that makes stairs comfortable.

Does stair climbing damage your knees?

This is the most common objection, and it deserves a straight answer rather than reassurance.

Stairs load the knee, particularly the patellofemoral joint behind the kneecap, considerably more than level walking does. Descent loads it more than ascent. Research published in BMJ Open on people with patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis found that altered knee mechanics during stair descent were linked to worse pain, worse function and more severe cartilage damage.

There is also a population-level signal that should not be waved away. A large survey in Shantou, China, published in PLoS ONE, compared 2,337 adults living in buildings without lifts against 1,719 living in buildings with them. Knee pain was more common in the no-lift group (11.32% against 8.82%), and among adults aged 16 to 64 the prevalence of knee osteoarthritis was higher too (5.89% against 3.95%). The authors concluded that stair climbing might be an important risk factor for knee pain and knee osteoarthritis.

That is one cross-sectional study in one city, and cross-sectional data cannot separate cause from consequence any better than the mortality cohorts can. But it is nothing, and it is the kind of finding that usually gets omitted from articles promoting stairs.

Now the other side. In a 13-year follow-up of adults with or at high risk of knee osteoarthritis, published in The Journal of Rheumatology, those who climbed at least seven flights a week had a 38% lower hazard of all-cause mortality. People who reported difficulty climbing stairs had a 54% to 84% higher hazard. Difficulty on stairs turned out to be a useful early functional signal, not a reason to stop.

The practical position that fits both sets of findings:

• If your knees are healthy, stairs are unlikely to harm them and will strengthen the quadriceps that protect them.
• If you carry significant excess weight, the load through the knee on stairs is proportionally higher, which is one more reason to build the habit gradually and take the lift down. Our guide on obesity, its health risks and treatment covers the joint-loading side of this in more detail.
• If you already have knee pain on stairs, descend by lift, ascend by stairs, and get the knee assessed rather than training through it.
• Pain during or after climbing that lasts more than a day is a signal to reduce volume, not to push on.

Who should be careful, and who should not start without advice

Stair climbing is vigorous exercise. The Healthcare review that raised the reverse-causation problem also made this point with some force: because stairs exceed six METs and recruit anaerobic pathways, they impose a real and abrupt cardiovascular demand.

Take medical advice before starting a deliberate stair programme if any of the following apply:

• Known coronary artery disease. The sudden rise in myocardial oxygen demand can provoke ischaemia. That does not rule stairs out, and the cardiac rehabilitation trial above used them successfully, but it was supervised for the first four weeks for a reason.
• Aortic stenosis or other significant valvular disease. Vigorous exertion carries a risk of syncope and haemodynamic instability.
• Uncontrolled high blood pressure. Get the numbers into a reasonable range first. Our guide to hypertension management in India covers what that range looks like and how to get there.
• Any chest pain, unusual breathlessness or dizziness on exertion, whether or not you have a diagnosis. This needs assessment before it needs exercise.
• Recent cardiac event, cardiac surgery or a new arrhythmia.
• Significant balance impairment, dizziness, or a history of falls. Stair falls in older adults are a serious injury mechanism. In the UK alone, stair falls in older people’s homes are estimated to cause up to 575 deaths and 350,000 injuries a year, and a US analysis found stair-related upper limb fractures in over-65s rose 56% over a decade.
• Advanced knee or hip osteoarthritis, where a physiotherapist should guide the loading.

For everyone else, the general precautions are ordinary common sense: hold the handrail, wear shoes with grip rather than chappals, do not climb with your phone in your hand, do not do it in an unlit stairwell, and slow down going down.

Stairs or walking: which should you actually do?

This is the wrong question, but people ask it, so here is the useful comparison.

Walking is lower intensity, easier to sustain for long periods, kinder to knees, and has the deepest evidence base of any physical activity. If you can only build one habit, build the walking one, and our daily walking guide covers how to structure it.

Stairs are higher intensity per minute, far more time-efficient, better at raising peak oxygen uptake, and available in moments too short for a walk. They also work when it is 42 degrees outside, when the air quality index is unpleasant, or when it is raining, which between them covers a large fraction of the Indian calendar.

The two solve different problems. Walking builds total activity volume. Stairs build intensity and fitness. The combination is better than either.

There is one place where stairs win outright, and that is breaking up sitting. If you spend eight hours at a desk, a walk at 7 pm does not undo the physiology of that day, and the health hazards of prolonged sitting accumulate through the day rather than waiting to be settled at the end of it. Two minutes of stairs every half hour, as in the Indian crossover trial, addresses the problem where it happens.

What stair climbing will not do

A few claims circulate that the evidence does not support, and it is worth being clear about them.

Stairs are not a weight-loss strategy on their own. Six flights a day is a genuinely useful health intervention and a trivial number of calories. Weight change is driven overwhelmingly by total energy balance over months. Stairs help at the margin and change body composition mainly through the fitness and muscle they build, not through the energy they burn.

The 39% figure is not a personal risk reduction. It is a between-group association in observational data. Reading it as ‘if I climb stairs my chance of cardiac death falls by 39%’ misunderstands what the study measured.

Stairs do not replace the weekly activity guidelines. The WHO recommendation of 150 minutes of moderate or 75 minutes of vigorous activity a week still stands. Stairs are one of the easiest ways to contribute to it, not an exemption from it.

Stairs are not a substitute for treating the risk factors you already have. If your blood pressure, lipids, HbA1c or smoking status are the problem, stairs are an addition to treatment, not an alternative to it.

Frequently asked questions

How many flights of stairs a day is enough to matter?

Six flights a day is the most defensible target, roughly 60 to 100 steps. Below five flights, the large cohort studies show little to no measurable association with cardiovascular outcomes. Above about 15 flights, the benefit plateaus rather than continuing to climb.

Is going up or coming down better for you?

Ascending is the aerobic work and where the cardiovascular and fitness benefits come from. Descending is eccentric loading, which builds muscle strength differently but places the highest load on the knee and carries almost all of the fall risk. For most beginners, and for anyone with knee trouble, the sensible pattern is stairs up and lift down.

Does one minute of stairs really lower blood sugar?

After a meal, yes, measurably. A randomised crossover trial found a drop of roughly 14 mg/dL in post-meal glucose after just one minute of stair climbing and descending compared with sitting, with three minutes producing a larger effect and also improving insulin sensitivity. The effect is most reliable in people with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes and less consistent in people whose glucose control is already normal. If you have not checked, the early signs of high blood sugar are worth knowing.

Should I take one step at a time or two?

Two steps at a time recruits more muscle and produces larger drops in resting and exercise heart rate in an eight-week trial in older adults. It also demands more balance and more knee bend, so start with one step at a time and progress only when the single-step version feels easy and stable.

How fast should I climb?

For general health benefit, a pace where talking becomes noticeably harder but is still possible. For the ‘exercise snack’ effect studied in trials, short bursts of 20 to 30 seconds where you genuinely cannot hold a conversation, followed by full recovery. Both are useful. Neither requires you to arrive anywhere gasping.

Is it safe to climb stairs if I have high blood pressure?

If your blood pressure is well controlled on treatment and you have no symptoms, generally yes. If it is uncontrolled, or you have not had it checked recently, get it assessed first. Vigorous exertion produces a sharp acute rise in blood pressure, which is a different matter from the long-term lowering that regular activity produces.

I get breathless after two floors. Is that normal?

It is common, and it is also information. Breathlessness that improves over a few weeks of gradual practice is deconditioning, which is exactly what training fixes. Breathlessness that is new, worsening, out of proportion to the effort, or accompanied by chest discomfort, dizziness or unusual fatigue should be assessed by a doctor rather than trained through. Persistent unexplained tiredness has its own set of causes worth ruling out.

Does stair climbing help mental focus?

There is some early evidence. A randomised crossover trial in the Journal of Cognitive Enhancement found that university students had faster correct response times across three cognitive tasks after a short interval stair-climbing session compared with a control condition. The same study found essentially no mood benefit at around 25 minutes afterwards, which is worth stating alongside the positive finding rather than reporting only the good half.

Can older adults do this safely?

Many can, and the balance and heart-rate benefits in the over-70 trial were meaningful. But stair falls are one of the more serious injury mechanisms in this age group, so the precautions are not optional: good lighting, a solid handrail used every time, no carrying objects, proper footwear, and lift down rather than stairs down. Anyone with a history of falls or unsteadiness should be assessed by a physiotherapist first.

What if my building’s staircase is unusable?

A single flight climbed repeatedly works. So does the staircase at a metro station, an office building, a mall or a flyover footbridge. The trials that produced the biggest fitness gains used one staircase and repeated it, not a tower block.

Does taking the stairs count towards the 150 minutes a week?

Yes, and because stairs exceed six METs, they count as vigorous rather than moderate activity, meaning a minute of stairs contributes roughly twice as much as a minute of brisk walking. Six flights a day will not on its own reach the target, but it makes a meaningful dent in it.

Is there any benefit if I stop after a few months?

The cohort data suggests the habit needs to be maintained. In the UK Biobank ASCVD analysis, people who climbed stairs at baseline and had stopped by the follow-up survey five years later had a 32% higher risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease than people who had never climbed stairs at all. That finding almost certainly reflects declining health causing the stopping rather than the other way round, but either way it argues for consistency, and for treating loss of stair tolerance as something to investigate rather than accept.

The bottom line

The August 2026 meta-analysis is a good piece of work reporting a real and consistent association, and it was oversold almost everywhere it was covered. Stair climbers do have substantially lower rates of cardiovascular and all-cause death across hundreds of thousands of people and more than a decade of follow-up. Whether the stairs cause that, or whether healthy people climb more stairs, cannot be settled by observational data.

What can be settled is what happens when you make people climb stairs in a controlled trial. Cardiorespiratory fitness rises in sedentary young women, in older adults and in patients with coronary artery disease. Post-meal blood glucose falls, measurably, after a single minute. Resting heart rate drops. Balance improves.

Those are real, tested, mechanistically sensible effects, and they are enough on their own. You do not need the 39% to justify taking the stairs.

Start with one flight a day. Aim for six. Take the lift down while your knees learn the habit. Add a minute after lunch. That is the whole intervention, and it costs nothing.

This article is for general information and is not a substitute for personalised medical advice. Speak to a doctor before starting a new exercise programme if you have heart disease, high blood pressure, joint problems, a history of falls, or any symptoms on exertion.

Sources

1. Sophie Paddock, R. Veerni, U. Bhalraam, et al. Evaluating the Impact of Stair Climbing on Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2026.
2. University of East Anglia. Taking the stairs could protect your heart and help you live longer. Research summary, August 2026.
3. Miguel A. Sánchez-Lastra, et al. Stair climbing and mortality: a prospective cohort study from the UK Biobank. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 2021.
4. Andrea Raisi, et al. Association of Stair Use With Risk of Major Chronic Diseases. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2023.
5. Zimin Song, et al. Daily stair climbing, disease susceptibility, and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A prospective cohort study. Atherosclerosis, 2023.
6. Davide Di Baggio and Vincenzo Romano Spica. Reconsidering Causal Interpretation of Stair-Climbing Epidemiology and Necessary Precautions for Cardiovascular Patients. Healthcare, 2026.
7. Colin A. Boreham, et al. Training effects of short bouts of stair climbing on cardiorespiratory fitness, blood lipids, and homocysteine in sedentary young women. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005.
8. Mary K. Allison, et al. Brief Intense Stair Climbing Improves Cardiorespiratory Fitness. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2017.
9. Emily C. Dunford, et al. Brief Vigorous Stair Climbing Effectively Improves Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2021.
10. Lars Donath, et al. Effects of stair-climbing on balance, gait, strength, resting heart rate, and submaximal endurance in healthy seniors. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2014.
11. Mingyue Yin, et al. Effects of Integrating Stair Climbing-Based Exercise Snacks Into the Campus on Feasibility, Perceived Efficacy, and Participation Perspectives in Inactive Young Adults: A Randomized Mixed-Methods Pilot Study. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2024.
12. Jeff M. Moore, et al. One minute of stair climbing and descending reduces postprandial insulin and glucose with 3-min improving insulin resistance following a mixed meal in young adults: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial. Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness, 2024.
13. Jin Hong, et al. Effects of acute and chronic stair-climbing exercise on metabolic health: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2024.
14. E. Thirunavukkarasu, M. R. Aerva, B. Chandrasekaran, G. A. Maiya and C. R. Rao. Short-term effects of brief stair climbing interruptions on postprandial hyperglycemia during prolonged sitting: a randomized cross-over trial. Scientific Reports, 2025.
15. Tobias Engeroff, et al. After Dinner Rest a While, After Supper Walk a Mile? A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis on the Acute Postprandial Glycemic Response to Exercise Before and After Meal Ingestion. Sports Medicine, 2023.
16. Emmanuel Stamatakis, Matthew N. Ahmadi, Jason M. R. Gill, et al. Association of wearable device-measured vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity with mortality. Nature Medicine, 2022.
17. Jason T. Jakiela, et al. The Association of Stair Climbing Behaviors With Hazard of All-Cause Mortality in Adults With or At Risk of Knee Osteoarthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology, 2024.
18. Shao-ying Zeng, et al. Changes in the Prevalence of Rheumatic Diseases in Shantou, China, in the Past Three Decades: A COPCORD Study. PLoS ONE, 2015.
19. Eric Hammond, et al. Predictors of pain and cartilage damage in patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis: stair descent knee kinematics and kinetics. BMJ Open, 2025.
20. Emily Wharton, et al. ‘I don’t know if it makes a difference to safety?’ perception vs actuality: A mixed-methods study on older adults’ experiences of home stair falls revealed during COVID-19 lockdown. PLOS One, 2025.
21. Rafat H. Solaiman, et al. Rising incidence of stair-related upper extremity fractures among older adults in the United States: a 10-year nationwide analysis. Osteoporosis International, 2023.
22. Liana Machado, A. Berryman and C. Perry. Cognition, Mood, and Brain Hemodynamics After Interval Stair Climbing: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial in University Students. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 2026.
23. World Health Organization. Nearly 1.8 billion adults at risk of disease from not doing enough physical activity. WHO news release, 2024, reporting data published in The Lancet Global Health.
24. World Health Organization, India. Cardiovascular diseases.